My coworkers hear it all the time and are profoundly uninterested me: Okay, this isn't going to work. I have these characters drinking tea again. They need to do something else immediately. These words are chopped. Two hundred gone. And let's see, the confrontation is coming up soon. Any suggestions? also me: Oh. My. God. Why bother? No one reads your books. No one thinks they're anything more than adequate. You can't seem to change your style to fit what people want. You're old news. OLD. NEWS. Stale old voice. There's no point in writing yet another book that no one will wants-- me: How about if they finally talk instead of just hinting around? Yeah, and maybe that guy will say what's been on his mind since chapter two. also me: Jesus. So boring. Talk, talk, talk. You know that your-- me: How about if they-- also me: --you know your books are worthless because people want conflict and angst. They don't want to read another book wit...
Hmmm.
ReplyDeleteThat's a pretty vast kind of generalization, right there.
Well, they could be *both*.
ReplyDeleteIt's not as elegant out of context. It summed up a whole argument and I liked it.
ReplyDeleteSo there.
Kate's Slice of Soul.
Well, Motown records are arguably slices of soul, but as Kate says, you need to see the sentence in context.
ReplyDeleteGlad you liked it Kate.
. . . and you know the "so there" is silliness, yes?
ReplyDeleteThe world is full of bad feeling at the moment--I figure being clear is the way to go.
i like it...it's as deep as you need it to be....the 'so there" definitely strokes my inner child...
ReplyDeletedo they still use that term...inner child...oh who care ...ya got the drift eh ?????
Noooooooooo! It's my soul, I tell you, my soul!
ReplyDeleteSo happens my soul is full of wingless birds and high power rifle-toting boars and giant romance-loving spiders and porno-loving dogs and . . . you get the idea.