bleeding hell.

I was trying to add Bettie and others but now my links are gone and my headline is gone. I hate html. If the whole blog disappears...I'll miss you guys.

Comments

  1. bettie4:18 PM

    Thanks for the thought!

    I've had a much easier time of it since I switched to "New Blogger". Those widgets make little changes to the template so much easier.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Carrie Lofty4:56 PM

    Does that mean I get a blogroll link?? Pwweeeese?

    ReplyDelete
  3. Rosie9:07 PM

    Miss us? Really? We aren't like the unexpected company or the neighbor who never leaves after one cup of coffee? Wow!

    ReplyDelete
  4. Kate9:41 PM

    YES, I'd miss you, a lot.

    And I think I did get the little links right. Let me know if you wish to have a different title. ("Queen of the Universe")

    ReplyDelete
  5. Anonymous1:06 AM

    You can't miss me. I have your email address.

    Can't get away from me that easily, o woman who once proclaimed she wanted to have my babies.

    (and you thought I would eventually forget . . . )

    ReplyDelete
  6. Corn Dog2:30 AM

    Ok, see ya in the next life - which doesn't have HTML

    ReplyDelete
  7. Kate7:23 AM

    This IS the other side. It's minus the special page stuff that Bec designed for me, bu it's plus the cute widget / easy to use stuff.

    Welcome to heaven. Hell and/or purgatory was yesterday when I was trying to find all the stuff I'd lost--without success.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Anonymous11:29 AM

    I swear it's going around!

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

No snark. Bad puppy. No. (Review stuff.)

A two star Amazon review on His American Detective: "Bodice ripper about gay men by a woman." and I'm longing to comment "don't you mean a waistcoat ripper?" God, no. Stop me. The reviews rarely rattle me any longer -- except when I spot a truth in a bad one. When that happens, I actually lose sleep. This means I still care about writing.  Speaking of reviewers and writers: A couple of days ago, a writer said she was tired of getting white ladies writing reviews of her books. She had an excellent point in the long run: her stories are meant for a particular audience and she wants them to resonate with those people and get more reviews from them.  But that first line was just....horribly obnoxious. I say this from my POV of course. Not a white lady who writes reviews -- but as a review grubber.   Anyone who disses any reader (especially ones that give honest reviews) deserves to be cast into the pit of being ignored.   ...
Read more

what I'm talking about above--the letter in RWR

I've cut out bits here and there but the gist is there. I don't want to cut too much because she's a good writer (other than the actual thinking/tolerance part) and it's bad idea to ignore that fact. . . . romance isn't about just any "two people" celebrating "love in its many forms." Organizations such as the Man-Boy Love Association would certainly refer to themselves as celebrating love "two people" (or more) finding love in one of its many forms" . . . while they actively promote pedophilia. Think RWA can't go down that slipper slope? Think again. Under our present definition, we cannot exclude such "love stories" under the category of "romance". We, as a culture, seem to have forgotten how to say "enough is enough," but RWA can--indeed, must--do better than that. . . . And, please, spare us the arguments about "censorship" and "inclusiveness." Preference for "one man,...
Read more