Television

Anyone else watch Hustle? We've become addicted and I think we're going to run out soon. We're definitely done with the stuff available at the local library and imdb tells me that there aren't many after that.

I don't understand why British television doesn't take a series all the way to the bitter end. It's just like The Office (the one set in Slough--a place I've visited more than once and yes, I know just how cool that makes me). They made a few seasons and then Ricky Gervais decided okay, they're done with that story. What's with the grand old tradition of grinding out episodes until the ratings and writing go into the toilet? Sheesh. Although ....are the Archers still out there on the radio?

Comments

  1. Lyvvie10:17 AM

    The Archers are still going strong, and you can download the podcast here. http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio4/archers/

    I've not watched Hustle. We're currently addicted to Chuck and Dirty, Sexy Money. Plus the UK version of The Apprentice is miles better as Sir Alan Sugar is a million times awesome on "Combover" Trump.

    Oh damn! I watch too much TV.

    Ricky Gervais went on to write/star in The Extras which was equally brilliant. I think he must get itchy feet and crave something new a lot.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Joanna Chambers3:53 PM

    And of course, we only do six episodes in every episode. Unlike in the US where every 'season' seems to have about 20 episodes. (We are not permitted to make longer series under European Regulations).

    ReplyDelete
  3. Chris4:04 PM

    I believe BBC has a grand old tradition of going out on a high note. Witness Fawlty Towers, which only ran 12 or 13 episodes (probably 12, baed on the comment above, but my memory is questionable on this one), and Blackadder. One advantage of publicly funded television is that the producers don't feel obliged to squeeze every possible nickel out of the franchise.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

No snark. Bad puppy. No. (Review stuff.)

A two star Amazon review on His American Detective: "Bodice ripper about gay men by a woman." and I'm longing to comment "don't you mean a waistcoat ripper?" God, no. Stop me. The reviews rarely rattle me any longer -- except when I spot a truth in a bad one. When that happens, I actually lose sleep. This means I still care about writing.  Speaking of reviewers and writers: A couple of days ago, a writer said she was tired of getting white ladies writing reviews of her books. She had an excellent point in the long run: her stories are meant for a particular audience and she wants them to resonate with those people and get more reviews from them.  But that first line was just....horribly obnoxious. I say this from my POV of course. Not a white lady who writes reviews -- but as a review grubber.   Anyone who disses any reader (especially ones that give honest reviews) deserves to be cast into the pit of being ignored.  
Read more
I can't stay away from the subject of Sarah Palin. I've been looking at the trashiest stories, too. Nothing to do with her stands on important issues (or if Alaska's proximity to Russia means she's got experience with foreign issues). Some of my conclusions from the wading into useless dreck: She's far better looking than she was when she did sportscasting. Say what you like about her, I think she's pretty. She's probably got the sort of charisma that gives me the willies. A lot of people who are considered inspiring make me want to escape their presence. A form of jealousy? A sense of inferiority? Maybe. Anyway, from the reports I've read, she's supposed to be the sort of person who makes you feel as if she's listening to you and cares about your opinion. She's got a room-filling presence. Eeearrrgh. All of that sounds just like what they said about Bill Clinton. I never particularly paid attention to the fact that Hillary is female--sure
Read more