two things today

1. Happy Release Day, Shannon!!!!



2. I have to get to work. The mail Briana mentioned is a story that needs revision. Lots of work--pity me. I think I'll drag the laptop outside to work on the deck. Skip the pity.

Comments

  1. Anonymous3:27 PM

    It's warm enough to work outside? Yikes! Not here, alas...

    ReplyDelete
  2. Kate4:49 PM

    yeah, it's been glorious weather here in New England for the last few days. Chilly at night and perfect during the day. The leaves are just starting to turn. I feel sorry for anyone who doesn't live here just now.

    BUT check back in a couple of months.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Shannon Stacey5:39 PM

    Thanks, Kate!!!

    And my condolences on the revisions. I swear they vary from as-hard-as-writing to harder-than. But you can do it!

    We've had a chilly fog here in NH each morning, then it burns off and it's in the low 80s. *basks in the sun*

    It all comes to an end on Friday. (Not surprisingly, the day we leave to go camping.)

    ReplyDelete
  4. Douglas Hoffman2:08 AM

    Now you have to post a pic of your view from the deck.

    I changed the Fox News link to a site selling thongs. Now I'm thinking it would be funnier if I linked to the Duggar Family Album page (that would scare a teenager away from sex, don't you think?)

    G'night!

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

No snark. Bad puppy. No. (Review stuff.)

A two star Amazon review on His American Detective: "Bodice ripper about gay men by a woman." and I'm longing to comment "don't you mean a waistcoat ripper?" God, no. Stop me. The reviews rarely rattle me any longer -- except when I spot a truth in a bad one. When that happens, I actually lose sleep. This means I still care about writing.  Speaking of reviewers and writers: A couple of days ago, a writer said she was tired of getting white ladies writing reviews of her books. She had an excellent point in the long run: her stories are meant for a particular audience and she wants them to resonate with those people and get more reviews from them.  But that first line was just....horribly obnoxious. I say this from my POV of course. Not a white lady who writes reviews -- but as a review grubber.   Anyone who disses any reader (especially ones that give honest reviews) deserves to be cast into the pit of being ignored.   ...
Read more

what I'm talking about above--the letter in RWR

I've cut out bits here and there but the gist is there. I don't want to cut too much because she's a good writer (other than the actual thinking/tolerance part) and it's bad idea to ignore that fact. . . . romance isn't about just any "two people" celebrating "love in its many forms." Organizations such as the Man-Boy Love Association would certainly refer to themselves as celebrating love "two people" (or more) finding love in one of its many forms" . . . while they actively promote pedophilia. Think RWA can't go down that slipper slope? Think again. Under our present definition, we cannot exclude such "love stories" under the category of "romance". We, as a culture, seem to have forgotten how to say "enough is enough," but RWA can--indeed, must--do better than that. . . . And, please, spare us the arguments about "censorship" and "inclusiveness." Preference for "one man,...
Read more