I'm over at Total Ebound blogging about shape-shifters again.
Popular posts from this blog
Doug has one of her covers at his place and it's a beaut.... Love Hungry Doctor . Here's another and it appears way tamer than LHD . (I lifted it from vintage sleaze where you can buy it) I saw Florence and her work at Doug's and thought there she is! The mother of my trade! This woman wrote more books than most people read in a lifetime and most of her titles were either steam-city--or sold to some disappointed people. Just the titles are titillating: Love Life of a Hollywood Mistress, Bedroom Agent, The Fleshpots, The Whipping Room . And those covers make the standard torso-gleaming, bodice-heaving, hair-rippling Fabio-esque event look tame. I want to get my hands on a Florence Stonebraker. Mother's day is coming up. Maybe my family will buy me this one. It's so strange that someone can have written that many books and not show up on any radar I know of. As someone pointed out, a women studies major would have a field day with Florence Stonebraker. What a
I've cut out bits here and there but the gist is there. I don't want to cut too much because she's a good writer (other than the actual thinking/tolerance part) and it's bad idea to ignore that fact. . . . romance isn't about just any "two people" celebrating "love in its many forms." Organizations such as the Man-Boy Love Association would certainly refer to themselves as celebrating love "two people" (or more) finding love in one of its many forms" . . . while they actively promote pedophilia. Think RWA can't go down that slipper slope? Think again. Under our present definition, we cannot exclude such "love stories" under the category of "romance". We, as a culture, seem to have forgotten how to say "enough is enough," but RWA can--indeed, must--do better than that. . . . And, please, spare us the arguments about "censorship" and "inclusiveness." Preference for "one ma