stuff

I'm going to go give a talk about research in Glastonbury, CT. Want to come? It's at 11 am today.

This is what the web page says I'm going to talk about:
Topic: Researching information to make your novels factually and historically accurate

which isn't really what I'm going to talk about at all. I do research to make the people and scenes better drawn, easier to see. Unique. I'm rotten at scene-setting so I look for anything that'll help. The "factually and historically accurate" is way, way less important to me than making the book feel like there's a there there or that the people aren't just a bunch of valley girls shoved back in time.

OR, If I'm writing about valley girls (damn, do they still exist?) that I don't screw them up and make them sound like a bunch of 40-something women. I do research to write a better book not to make it more Accurate. Bah. If I wanted accurate, I'd write articles again, and I don't wanna do that.

okay off that high horse.

And speaking of high horses, I do like Jenny Crusie's slapdown of Miss Snark, which the SBTB were squeeing about. I'm not sure why Crusie hated the phrase about clue cake so much. She stomped the shit out of the phrase.

Comments

  1. Carrie Lofty10:45 AM

    I appreciate Miss Snark because she can point out where people are being stoopid. And then I learn from the stoopid people and their mistakes. Fine. But all her squealing fans annoy me. As if, the more they can agree with her, the more likely she is to magically want to represent them!

    But I agree about your approach to the history thang. Accuracy is great, and the historian in me shouts that it's MOST IMPORTANT. I tell the historian to shut up because, if she was in charge, I'd still be in a uni doing PROFOUND RESEARCH. But I'm not. Scene building is hard, and sometimes I feel like a damn travel writer -- just for olden type times.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Grace Tyler2:00 AM

    Unless the Valley is still turning out "for shure, for shure" girls, the Valley Girls ARE 40ish.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Anonymous4:32 AM

    I'm with you 100% on the reasons for research. I'm not an anal research snob, but I've always done tons of research, mainly because it's the main source of inspiration for me.

    Which is one reason I write so slowly. Because I read slowly too.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Kate10:01 AM

    salome, it's clear to me that your research is thorough.

    grace, holy shit. you're right. they're all OLD. Paris Hilton? Does she count.

    kathy, I have to check now. You write historicals? Off to find out. . .

    ReplyDelete
  5. Anonymous2:49 PM

    No, I write contemps, but am thinking about doing a historical. Cause I love research so much!

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

more fun and hi-jinks at RWA.

To the Board of Directors of the Romance Writers of America: It has been brought to our attention, by several of our romance authors, that your organization no longer considers Medallion Press, Inc. a legitimate publisher according to your guidelines. We were surprised we did not receive official notification directly, but instead discovered it was posted on several RWA internet loops. Accordingly, we request this letter be published in its entirety in the RWR Report so all members may understand the nature of the process that eliminated Medallion as an RWA approved publisher. We will also send copies of this letter to all our own RWA member authors. We are dismayed you declared Medallion Press no longer a legitimate publisher. In July of 2004 we met all of your qualifications without incident by showing sales of 5000+ copies of USA Today Bestselling author Nan Ryan's The Last Dance. Several months prior to Book Expo America 2005, we received a call from your office alerting us to
Read more

No snark. Bad puppy. No. (Review stuff.)

A two star Amazon review on His American Detective: "Bodice ripper about gay men by a woman." and I'm longing to comment "don't you mean a waistcoat ripper?" God, no. Stop me. The reviews rarely rattle me any longer -- except when I spot a truth in a bad one. When that happens, I actually lose sleep. This means I still care about writing.  Speaking of reviewers and writers: A couple of days ago, a writer said she was tired of getting white ladies writing reviews of her books. She had an excellent point in the long run: her stories are meant for a particular audience and she wants them to resonate with those people and get more reviews from them.  But that first line was just....horribly obnoxious. I say this from my POV of course. Not a white lady who writes reviews -- but as a review grubber.   Anyone who disses any reader (especially ones that give honest reviews) deserves to be cast into the pit of being ignored.  
Read more