oh, ah

that last entry seemed to be all snarly about the romance when it should have been about the great reader. I only emphasized the crappiness of the book because if it had been merely been meh, then the gusto, the pure joy of the reader's work would be less heroic.

I love my new computer, thanks for asking, except the mouse seems travel a lot and ends up landing any which way all over the place so when I write stories without paying attention there are strange paragraphs inserted into words.

like this bit of gobbledygoop I just wrote:

Three dogs came hurtling from nowhere--silent shaggy creatures that threw themselves on Miguel. His dogs were always well behaved ater came gushing out, and without the thumps or air hisses of a system that had been off for a while.


well maybe it was funnier in the manuscript. Yeah, that's it.

Comments

  1. KATE! You're practicing William S. Burroughs's "cut-up" method, I see. How you doing? Why aren't you blogging?

    ReplyDelete
  2. I'm not blogging because people don't read my blog because I'm not blogging....
    and because I'm lazy and because.

    ReplyDelete
  3. what I should be doing more is reading other people's blogs.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

more fun and hi-jinks at RWA.

No snark. Bad puppy. No. (Review stuff.)